Evaluate the AutomationView desktop suite free for 30 days. No credit card required. Claim trial key →
arrow_back Back to Articles

Inside IEC 61499: A Tutorial on Event-Driven Distributed Control

calendar_month
person Carvalho Raphael

Inside IEC 61499: A Tutorial on Event-Driven Distributed Control

Learning
%%{init: {'theme':'dark', 'themeVariables': { 'background': '#001c38' }}}%%
flowchart LR
    classDef blueFill fill:#2563eb,stroke:#1d4ed8,color:#ffffff
    classDef greenFill fill:#16a34a,stroke:#15803d,color:#ffffff
    classDef redFill fill:#dc2626,stroke:#b91c1c,color:#ffffff

    event["Event Trigger"]:::blueFill --> fb1["IEC 61499 Function Block"]:::greenFill
    fb1 --> out["Distributed Action"]:::redFill
AutomationView Icon AutomationView

Key Takeaways:

  • IEC 61499 replaces the cyclic scan of traditional PLCs with an event-driven execution model.
  • The standard separates the application logic from the underlying hardware, enabling true platform independence.
  • Engineers can design object-oriented, encapsulated function blocks distributed across smart devices, edge gateways, and controllers.

Transitioning from the cyclic logic of IEC 61131-3 to the distributed intelligence of IEC 61499 requires a fundamental shift in mindset. You are no longer writing code that blindly executes from top to bottom every 10 milliseconds. Instead, you are orchestrating a network of intelligent, autonomous components that react asynchronously to physical events. This IEC 61499 tutorial explores how event-driven distributed control systems are reshaping the architecture of modern manufacturing.

The Shift from Cyclic Scan to Event-Driven Execution

Traditional PLC architectures rely on a rigid cycle: read all inputs, execute the entire logic tree, and write the outputs. While deterministic, this approach bottlenecks complex, distributed systems. IEC 61499 introduces an event-driven execution model where function blocks only process data when an explicit event triggers them.

This asynchronous behavior reduces CPU overhead and allows controllers to react instantly to localized changes. For engineers in the field, this means less time optimizing scan times and more time focusing on system-wide orchestration. However, it also introduces challenges in synchronization—you must design logic that handles race conditions natively.

flowchart TD
    classDef blueFill fill:#2563eb,stroke:#1d4ed8,color:#ffffff
    classDef greenFill fill:#16a34a,stroke:#15803d,color:#ffffff
    classDef redFill fill:#dc2626,stroke:#b91c1c,color:#ffffff

    subgraph traditional ["IEC 61131-3 (Cyclic)"]
        s1["Read Inputs"]:::blueFill --> s2["Execute Logic"]:::blueFill
        s2 --> s3["Write Outputs"]:::blueFill
        s3 --> s1
    end

    subgraph distributed ["IEC 61499 (Event-Driven)"]
        e1["Sensor Event"]:::greenFill --> fb["Function Block Execution"]:::redFill
        fb --> e2["Actuator Event"]:::greenFill
    end

Platform-Independent Application Design

One of the most powerful paradigms introduced by IEC 61499 is the strict separation between the Application (the control logic) and the Device (the hardware execution environment). You define the complete process logic as a unified network of function blocks, regardless of where those blocks will eventually run.

Once the application is designed, you map specific function blocks to physical devices on the network. A single logic sequence might have its data acquisition block mapped to a smart sensor, its processing block mapped to an edge gateway, and its output block mapped to a VFD. This platform independence drastically simplifies hardware migrations and multi-vendor deployments.

Encapsulation and Reusability with Function Blocks

While IEC 61131-3 has function blocks, IEC 61499 elevates them to fully encapsulated, object-oriented software components. Each block explicitly defines both data inputs/outputs and event inputs/outputs. The logic inside the block is driven by an Execution Control Chart (ECC)—a state machine that dictates how the block responds to different event triggers.

This modularity allows automation teams to build robust libraries of reusable assets. You can encapsulate complex kinematics or PID control into a single block, confidently deploying it across hundreds of distributed nodes without fearing side effects from global variables.

Comparison: Traditional PLCs vs. IEC 61499

Architecture Feature IEC 61131-3 (Traditional) IEC 61499 (Distributed)
Execution Model Cyclic (Continuous Scan) Event-Driven (Asynchronous)
Hardware Coupling Tightly Coupled (Logic tied to PLC) Decoupled (Platform Independent)
System Topology Centralized Controller Distributed Intelligence
State Management Global Variables / Flags Execution Control Charts (ECC)

Getting Started: Tools for Distributed Control

If you are looking to get hands-on experience, you do not need to rip and replace your existing PLCs. You can introduce an orchestration layer using an edge gateway running an IEC 61499 runtime to coordinate legacy systems.

Popular environments for exploring these concepts include the open-source Eclipse 4diac IDE, which is excellent for prototyping, and commercial platforms like Schneider Electric EcoStruxure Automation Expert (EAE) for production-grade universal automation.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is IEC 61499 replacing IEC 61131-3?

Not entirely. IEC 61131-3 remains dominant for local, tightly coupled machine control. IEC 61499 is primarily being adopted for higher-level orchestration, complex distributed intelligence, and IT/OT convergence layers.

How do I handle debugging in an event-driven system?

Debugging requires tracking event flows rather than monitoring cyclic variables. Advanced IEC 61499 IDEs provide event tracing and sequence monitoring tools to visualize the asynchronous execution across multiple devices.

To further modernize your control architectures, explore the advanced tools available in the AutomationView Store.

Share this article

Stay Updated with Learning

Get the latest articles and news delivered directly to your inbox.

Log in to Subscribe

You must be registered and logged in to manage subscriptions.

Recommended for you

Behavior-Driven Development: Shifting Left in PLC Testing

Learning
%%{init: {'theme':'dark', 'themeVariables': { 'background': '#001c38' }}}%%
flowchart LR
    classDef step fill:#2563eb,stroke:#60a5fa,stroke-width:2px,color:#ffffff
    classDef action fill:#16a34a,stroke:#4ade80,stroke-width:2px,color:#ffffff
    classDef test fill:#dc2626,stroke:#f87171,stroke-width:2px,color:#ffffff
    A["Given Initial State"]:::step --> B["When Input Triggered"]:::action
    B --> C["Then Expected Output"]:::test
AutomationView Icon AutomationView
calendar_month

Behavior-Driven Development: Shifting Left in PLC Testing

Manual “check-by-feeling” validation remains a significant bottleneck during industrial commissioning. Relying on physical observations to confirm PLC code correctness often leads to expensive delays and dangerous edge-case failures. Behavior-Driven Development (BDD) shifts the testing process left, allowing automation engineers to validate complex control logic against executable specifications long before deploying a single line of code […]

Read Article arrow_forward

How-To: Implementing PackML (ISA-TR88.00.02) State Machines in Modern PLCs

Learning
%%{init: {'theme':'dark', 'themeVariables': { 'background': '#001c38' }}}%%
---
title: PackML State Machine Implementation
---
flowchart LR
    classDef default fill:#1f2937,stroke:#4b5563,color:#f3f4f6
    classDef active fill:#2563eb,stroke:#1d4ed8,color:#ffffff
    classDef holding fill:#d97706,stroke:#b45309,color:#ffffff
    classDef stopped fill:#ef4444,stroke:#b91c1c,color:#ffffff
    A["Stopped"]:::stopped -->|Start| B["Starting"]:::active
    B --> C["Execute"]:::active
    C -->|Hold| D["Holding"]:::holding
    D -->|Unhold| E["Unholding"]:::active
    E --> C
AutomationView Icon AutomationView
calendar_month

How-To: Implementing PackML (ISA-TR88.00.02) State Machines in Modern PLCs

For decades, OEMs and systems integrators built custom, proprietary state machines for every packaging line they deployed. This resulted in fragmented codebases, operator confusion, and integration nightmares when trying to link an unwrapper from Vendor A with a filler from Vendor B. The ISA-TR88.00.02 standard, commonly known as PackML (Packaging Machine Language), solves this by […]

Read Article arrow_forward