SIL / PL PFHd Estimator
Evaluate Probability of Dangerous Failure per Hour for a safety loop.
Subsystem PFHd
Total System PFHd
Estimating Safety Integrity (SIL) and Performance Level (PL)
When designing safety-related parts of control systems (SRP/CS), engineers must evaluate the reliability of safety functions using international standards. The two primary standards are ISO 13849-1 (which defines Performance Level, PL) and IEC 62061 (which defines Safety Integrity Level, SIL).
The Role of PFHd
Both standards rely on the Probability of a dangerous failure per hour (PFHd) to quantify reliability. By calculating the PFHd of a complete safety loop (sensor, logic solver, and actuator), engineers can determine the resulting PL or SIL.
- PL e / SIL 3: PFHd ≥ 10-8 to < 10-7
- PL d / SIL 2: PFHd ≥ 10-7 to < 10-6
- PL b, c / SIL 1: PFHd ≥ 10-6 to < 10-5
Key Variables for Estimation
To accurately estimate the PFHd, several variables must be considered for each subsystem:
- MTTFd (Mean Time to Dangerous Failure): The expected time until a component fails dangerously.
- DC (Diagnostic Coverage): The effectiveness of the system’s automatic diagnostics to detect dangerous failures.
- CCF (Common Cause Failure): A score evaluating failures resulting from a single event.
- Architecture (Category): The structure of the safety channel, ranging from Category B (single channel) to Category 4 (dual channel with high diagnostics).
Using an Estimator Tool
A SIL / PL PFHd estimator simplifies the complex mathematical modeling required by ISO 13849-1 and IEC 62061. By selecting the architecture category, MTTFd, and DC, automation engineers can rapidly verify if their proposed safety circuit meets the required risk reduction targets before utilizing advanced tools like SISTEMA.